Trout more important than salmon fishery
Editor:
I respectfully disagree with the opinion expressed by Barry Leeds in his letter to the editor published last Friday, May 30. While I am in favor of restoring the Lake George salmon fishery, it should not be done at the expense of potentially damaging the lake trout fishery. Apparently Mr. Leeds was not reviewing the latest Angler Cooperative Diary report. The 2007 Angler Cooperative Diary report contains hard data that contradicts the theory that there are too many lake trout and a need to increase the number harvested. The catch rate has been declining in the north basin since 2004 and in the south basin since 2006. The report also indicates that the average size of lake trout caught has increased in 2006 and 2007.
Some may also not be aware that at one time size limit for lake trout on Lake George was 21 inches. It was increased in the 1990s as too many mature females were being removed, negatively impacting natural reproduction. Since the 23-inch size limit was put in place, stocking is no longer necessary, and Lake George has gained a reputation as a world class lake trout fishery.
Lake trout are native to Lake George, salmon are not. Before a change in regulations is made, it is imperative that scientific evidence be presented identifying the root cause of the problem. It is also felt that solutions to improve the salmon survival should not negatively impact the lake trout fishery.
EDWARD A. DONOGHUE
Salem
